Wednesday, April 17, 2019

The Declaration of Independence of US Research Paper

The Declaration of Independence of US - Research constitution ExampleUnfortunately, the linguistic process are also approximately entirely false as a campaign for actual guarantees of the kinds of freedoms espoused in the docu ment, at least as such guarantees might have applied to anyone in the colonial society who was non, like Jefferson, a white, male, wealthy land makeer with political and economic connections. In fact, crimson as Jefferson penned the words, the formal and informal seats of power in the colonies were occupied by men who have slaves, controlled wealth, and abused the rights of women. How then can Jefferson justify using the words? In this brief essay, the approach of Jefferson and the vox populi class that founded the nation to the ideals of political and economic freedoms and equality that they argued for will be reviewed in order to display how they violated the very terms established as reasons for their revolution. Specifically, the ways in which Jeff erson and other founding fathers acted against the words of the Declaration in bear ons to slaves, women and the non-wealthy working classes will be reviewed. Following a review of their actions toward each of these dowery groups, a reevaluation of the language of the Declaration will be conducted and a summary analysis of the ultimate prise of the founding principles contained in it will be offered. Although it is difficult to argue against the eloquence of the political principles contained in Jeffersons words in the Declaration, it is easy to see hypocrisy in his application of those words to the actual realities of his own family and community. In fact, as Damon Root argues there was a gap between espoused principles and political practices that resulted in an almost perfect paradox as realized in the person and figure of Jefferson. Nowhere was this gap more readily seen than on the issue of slavery. Root claims The celebrated author of the Declaration of Independence, which famously declares that all men are created equal and are born with the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness was also a slaveholder, a man whose livelihood was rooted in the subjugation of hundreds of human beings, including members of his wifes family and his own. Having penned words which seemed to testify that he believed in a form of basic equality among all persons, Jefferson lived a life which did not square with those words because he held in his formal possession as a legal and skipper matter the actual freedoms of a large number of persons, both men and women. He owned them and could do with them as he pleased, including among other things utilizing their physical labor for his economic benefit and utilizing their bodies for his sexual enjoyment. That mere fact, without regard to what kind of slave owner Jefferson actually was, whether he was kind or considerate to those who came under his purview, is sufficient to suggest that Jefferson e ither did not take his own words seriously or he believed that they had almost application to the broader society, such as the international community, but not to himself. Any other conclusion would call for one to find Jefferson simply being an outright hypocrite. Of course, this is one possible interpretation for his actions, and there were those, fifty-fifty in his day, who reached for it. Root

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.